I thought I would share the graphic I use in my class to explain that an arts venture can satisfy both the individual needs/wants of the artist and the needs/wants of a community:
For more, see “Why Arts Entrepreneurship“
I thought I would share the graphic I use in my class to explain that an arts venture can satisfy both the individual needs/wants of the artist and the needs/wants of a community:
For more, see “Why Arts Entrepreneurship“
Pingback: The Double Bottom Line of Arts Entrepreneurship | Creative Infrastructure
Richard:
Derrick Chong in his great book on arts management notes that an arts organization needs to commit to excellence and artistic integrity (as well as accessibility and accountability). “This is to suggest that merely offering the public what it wants is an abdication of responsibility” (p. 19). Just because an arts organization or arts manager is responsive to a public, does not mean it is *merely* meeting the needs and wants of that public, but it is *also* doing so, while simultaneously producing or presenting excellent art responsibly.
Robert Genter in his great book ‘Late Modernism’ says this about the Modernist thinkers concerns with totalitarianism, alienation, and capitalistic consumerism.
“The tools of sophisticated discrimination and contemplation were expelled from the minds of mass consumers in the name of profit and social control”.
The idea that society, or “community”, even can realize what they need or want is as much of a question today as it was during Modernism’s heyday. Maybe more so.